Hello,

On Wednesday 13 October 2010, 11:02:33 Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > http://old.nabble.com/Self-reception-and-more-td29760073.html
> > http://old.nabble.com/Self-reception-td29932236.html
> 
> I'm following the discussion and realized that it will not work for
> devices doing the local loopback in hardware, like the flexcan
> controller. Strictly speaking it will only work properly for drivers
> doing the local loopback in software when the TX done interrupt is
> handled. Also some USB devices are not able to do that properly.

Is it possible, that at91_can does also hardware loopback? If I use the 
default socket options (CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK = 1, CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS = 0), I 
also receive my own frames on the same socket. setting CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS 
to 1 doesn't change anything. But if I set CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK to 0, I don't get 
any frame I sent. I guess the latter is intended.

Best regards,
Alexander
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users

Reply via email to