On 01/13/2011 12:25 AM, Willy Lambert wrote: > 2011/1/12 Willy Lambert <[email protected]> > >> Because after lots of tests of moving jumpers it ended in this config. As I >> don't have serial yet it should work no ? Anyway I'll change because it is >> not an accurate choice >> >> 2011/1/12 Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]> >> >> Hi Willy, >>> >>> On 01/12/2011 01:55 AM, Willy Lambert wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> for memory I have been trying to makes socketCan working on my Ixxat >>> board >>>> for some time. It is stacked on a PC104 cpu module with a linux debian >>>> squeeze. After having a fully hardware configuration (a proper node + >>> can >>>> analyser) I tried Ixxat drivers and succeed after soldering a jumper on >>> the >>>> board and setting some BIOS values. After this I quickly tested a >>> socketCan >>>> version from svn and it seems to works (at least interrupts were >>> triggered). >>>> >>>> Cleaning time arrived and I complety reinstall the linux with only the >>>> required kernel configuration. The choosed kernel is a 2.6.35.7. >>>> My first question is : may I use kernel official sources of socketCan ? >>> or >>>> do I need to checkout something ? >>>> >>>> I activated theses options : >>>> >>>>> [*] Networking Support --> >>>>> --- [*] CAN bus subsystem support --> >>>>> ----------[*] Raw Can Protocol (raw access with CAN-ID filtering) >>>>> ----------[*] Broadcast Manager CAN Protocol (with content filtering) >>>>> ---------- CAN Device Drivers ---> >>>>> ----------------- [*] Virtual Local CAN Interface (vcan) >>>>> ----------------- [*] Platform CAN drivers with Netlonk support >>>>> ----------------- [*] CAN bit-timing calculation >>>>> ----------------- [*] Philips/NXP SJA1000 devices --> >>>>> -------------------------[M] ISA Bus based legacy SJA1000 driver >>>>> >>>> All remark is welcome (espacially if I need to choose "M" instead of "*"
If you select "M", the drive will be built as module otherwise it's statically linked into the kernel. > Is this usable from the current 2.6.35.7 official Linux tree ? or do I need > other sources ? Should be fine. >>> I setup my can0 interface in the rc.local script : >>>> >>>>> modprobe sja1000_isa irq=3 mem=0XD0000 >>> >>> Why do you use irq=3 now. IIRC, it's used for the serial port. Why not >>> irq=5? >>> >> > same with irq5. I have the same problem with Ixxat drivers. so it's again an > interrupt problem. Do I need to activate some option into the kernel ? I'm a bit confused. What is the current status of using CAN on you system. Does the BCI driver from IXXAT now work properly? Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users
