On 04/27/2011 04:44 PM, Willy Lambert wrote:
> 2011/4/27 Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]>
> 
>> Hi Willy,
>>
>> On 04/27/2011 03:11 PM, Willy Lambert wrote:
>>> 2011/4/27 Heinz-Jürgen Oertel <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>> Am Mittwoch, 27. April 2011, 13:56:10 schrieb Willy Lambert:
>>>>> 2011/4/27 Willy Lambert <[email protected]<mailto:
>>>> [email protected]>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> you did not mention that you have checked the
>>>> IRQ jumpers on the PC104 board, but I'm sure you did. When you say
>>>>> _ one PC104 CAN board with configured jumpers.
>>>> I assume you are using this board  first on the "old CPU board"
>>>> next on the new CPU board without changing the jumpers.
>>>> In this case, no idea.
>>>>
>>>
>>> that's it, I did not touch anything on the PC104 stack. So the jumpers
>> are
>>> well configured in both cases. And I did the tests several times, they
>> could
>>> not have been disconnected by error.
>>>
>>> I recheck my linux 2.6.35.7 .config files, and they are identicall on
>> both
>>> CPU boards.
>>
>> You said, the hardware is identical, same cpu, motherboard, etc., right?
>>
> 
> everything is equal in term of reference (the 2 CPU board are the same
> product with the same BIOS version,...). The only notable hardware
> difference is the alimentation, but they both seems to be powered properly
> (and the BIOS voltage values are correct, they are even better on the can
> reticent board) and I have pluged a VGA cable on the working board (I don't
> see why this could change anything on the can side)
> 
> 
>> Do you see any diffenrence in the bootlog if you boot the same kernel?
>>
> 
> what do you mean by bootlog ? /var/log/dmesg ? they are very similar, see

Yes, the output of "dmesg".

> the logs (the good CPU is alpha).
> it is the same .config but compiled on 2 different machines as you can see.

Hm, they are identical. I do not see any difference!?

Wolfgang.
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users

Reply via email to