On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:08:29PM +0400, Yuriy Kiselev wrote: > Hello! > Implementation of BasicCAN mode for SJA1000 is in attachment. > Now SJA1000_PELICAN_MODE macros in sja1000.h is used for definition PeliCAN > or BasicCAN mode. It would be nice to create some menuconfig-wrapper, I > think. > I use this code for a few weeks and it looks stable. I see no reason to use BasicCAN mode instead of PeliCAN mode. Instead, I do see reasons to use PeliCAN mode:
* no problems when 29bit frames appear on the bus * rx queue of 64 byte. What is your motivation not to use PeliCAN mode? Kurt _______________________________________________ Socketcan-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users
