On 9/7/07, Jim Razmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Vincent Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070907 01:36]: > > On 9/6/07, snowcrash+soekris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > fwiw, i've a 'full' fbsd 6.2 (not openbsd, etm) + spamd etc. on a > Net4801. > > > > > > though a little 'tight', it hums along just fine. > > > > > > here's a current 'top' snapshot: > > > > > > last pid: 83852; load averages: 0.08, 0.04, 0.00 > > > up 7+00:45:36 07:00:58 > > > 26 processes: 1 running, 25 sleeping > > > CPU states: 2.6% user, 0.0% nice, 1.7% system, 5.1% interrupt, > 90.6%idle > > > Mem: 67M Active, 98M Inact, 61M Wired, 13M Cache, 34M Buf, 3172K Free > > > Swap: 512M Total, 7116K Used, 505M Free, 1% Inuse > > > > > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU > COMMAND > > > 83852 root 1 96 0 2324K 1364K RUN 0:00 0.08% top > > > 510 root 1 96 0 3400K 636K select 33:19 0.05% ppp > > > 901 root 1 96 0 3000K 628K select 2:10 0.00% ntpd > > > 492 _pflogd 1 -58 0 1624K 428K bpf 1:43 0.00% pflogd > > > 864 _spamd 1 -58 0 2540K 508K bpf 1:41 0.00%spamlogd > > > 94321 root 1 96 0 4816K 2360K select 1:37 0.00% sshd > > > 6286 bind 5 96 0 31516K 28456K select 0:53 0.00% named > > > 854 _spamd 1 96 0 5804K 1944K select 0:20 0.00% spamd > > > 94323 root 1 20 0 6340K 3820K pause 0:16 0.00% tcsh > > > 1071 root 1 8 0 1388K 280K nanslp 0:13 0.00% cron > > > 3095 root 1 96 0 4816K 2784K select 0:13 0.00% sshd > > > 736 root 1 96 0 1380K 400K select 0:12 0.00%syslogd > > > 5493 rbldns 1 4 0 13384K 10160K sbwait 0:05 0.00% rbldnsd > > > 6467 www 1 4 0 4124K 2276K kqread 0:05 0.00%lighttpd > > > 921 root 1 96 0 1288K 312K select 0:03 0.00% usbd > > > 1045 mailnull 1 96 0 7604K 324K select 0:02 0.00% > exim-4.67-0 > > > 490 root 1 4 0 1560K 292K sbwait 0:02 0.00% pflogd > > > 3097 root 1 5 0 5452K 2816K ttyin 0:01 0.00% tcsh > > > 1110 root 1 96 0 1464K 468K select 0:00 0.00% inetd > > > 1013 dhcpd 1 96 0 2188K 152K select 0:00 0.00% dhcpd > > > 121 root 1 20 0 1252K 0K pause 0:00 0.00% > <adjkerntz> > > > 676 root 1 107 0 528K 0K select 0:00 0.00% <devd> > > > > > > that should give you some sense of usage ... > > > > > > hth > > > > > > > > Thanks guys,this is my top on the PC: > > > > load averages: 0.15, 0.13, 0.09 > > 22:27:16 > > 22 processes: 21 idle, 1 on processor > > CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.2% interrupt, > 99.8%idle > > Memory: Real: 24M/82M act/tot Free: 353M Swap: 0K/1024M used/tot > > > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIME CPU > COMMAND > > 20068 _spamd 2 0 15M 11M sleep select 1:16 0.00% spamd > > 19764 _spamd 10 0 9964K 1144K idle nanosl 0:03 0.00% spamd > > 5776 _syslogd 2 0 572K 660K sleep poll 0:02 0.00%syslogd > > 16049 _spamd -6 0 9732K 768K idle piperd 0:01 0.00% spamd > > 9752 _pflogd 4 0 672K 312K sleep bpf 0:01 0.00% pflogd > > 8203 root 2 0 3332K 2360K idle select 0:00 0.00% sshd > > 3162 _spamd 4 0 568K 460K sleep bpf 0:01 0.00%spamlogd > > 3593 root 2 0 636K 1200K idle select 0:00 0.00% sshd > > 16230 root 2 0 664K 692K sleep select 0:00 0.00% cron > > 10963 root 3 0 476K 536K idle ttyin 0:00 0.00% ksh > > 15886 root 2 0 3132K 2200K sleep select 0:00 0.00% sshd > > 15784 root 28 0 608K 1016K onproc - 0:00 0.00% top > > 13170 root 2 0 488K 564K idle netio 0:00 0.00%syslogd > > 4870 root 18 0 448K 520K idle pause 0:00 0.00% ksh > > 1 root 10 0 320K 332K idle wait 0:00 0.00% init > > 12712 root 3 0 368K 552K idle ttyin 0:00 0.00% getty > > 25015 root 2 0 604K 440K idle netio 0:00 0.00% pflogd > > 14604 root 3 0 240K 556K idle ttyin 0:00 0.00% getty > > 11680 root 2 0 368K 552K idle select 0:00 0.00% inetd > > 18363 root 3 0 296K 564K idle ttyin 0:00 0.00% getty > > 22202 root 3 0 260K 556K idle ttyin 0:00 0.00% getty > > 10264 root 3 0 424K 556K idle ttyin 0:00 0.00% getty > > > > so I guess it should be fine to run on net4801 > > > _______________________________________________ > > I run a 4801 with a boat load of stuff on it. I've been the victim of > joe jobs a couple times and spamd running in grey listing mode performed > great. Machine was 40-70% busy while the back scatter was hitting me. > And since I use grey trapping on top of spamd, all those back scatters > to non-existent accounts were flagged as spam which spamd faithfully > blocked. Ran for 3+ days non stop with spamd managing 700+ connections > before it started to trail off. In the mean time, all my other mail, > web traffic, etc flowed just without visible impact. > > Latest OpenBSD also has numerous improvement in the network stack and > sis driver too. > > HTH, > Jim
Is it worth to compile and install custom OpenBSD kernel for net4801 using flashdist? will general OpenBSD kernel be fine? Thanks
_______________________________________________ Soekris-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
