http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_jack
der Mouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > While we're at it, there is no RJ-45. It's RJ48. RJ45 is 8 pin, 2 > > conductor. What everyone calls RJ45 should have been a variant of > > RJ48. > > I thought what's usually called RJ45 isn't RJ-anything because the RJ > stuff is for particular ways of putting POTS pairs on those connectors, > and thus if you're not doing POTS over the lines it's not RJxx. (Well, > it might be fair to speak of RJ45 - or RJ48 - _connectors_, as in, the > connectors appropriate for RJwhatever, ut then put them to another use, > much as one could speak of a DB25 as being an RS232 connector even if > one then uses it for a parallel port or something.) > > Is my impression of RJ wrong? > > /~\ The ASCII der Mouse > \ / Ribbon Campaign > X Against HTML [EMAIL PROTECTED] > / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B > _______________________________________________ > Soekris-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech -- Too many clocks, not enough time (Al. Einstein) _______________________________________________ Soekris-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
