Hi, Do you explicitly destroy any handles rather than unreffing them? I remember I had some problem with posthumous event delivery in a corner case, or something.
Best regards, Mikhail >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of ext Fabio Margarido >Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 8:37 PM >To: sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Assertion `sub && sub->sub_ref >!= 0' failed > >Bump. Any help anyone? This is kinda urgent. >Thanks. > >On Dec 12, 2007 8:41 AM, Fabio Margarido ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I got this one today when running more performance tests on my >> application. Is this my fault or could it be a bug? >> Thanks. >> >> nta_outgoing_tcancel: trying to cancel cancelled request >> tport_vsend(0x8128f20): send truncated for UDP/10.20.90.31:5060 >> nta: ACK (92573398): Input/output error (5) with >UDP/[10.20.90.31]:5060 >> nta(0x823bff8): responding 503 Service Unavailable to ACK! >> tpsip: su_alloc.c:571: su_home_ref: Assertion `sub && >sub->sub_ref != 0' >> failed. >> >> Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. >> [Switching to Thread 3076 (LWP 1695)] >> 0x401f4621 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 >> Current language: auto; currently c >> (gdb) where >> #0 0x401f4621 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 >> #1 0x4014e26b in raise (sig=6) at signals.c:65 >> #2 0x401f5a53 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 >> #3 0x401ede12 in __assert_fail () from /lib/libc.so.6 >> #4 0x400cca9a in su_home_ref (home=0x868db40) at su_alloc.c:571 >> #5 0x400ce518 in su_home_mutex_lock (home=0x868db40) at >su_alloc.c:1483 >> #6 0x4005c2ec in msg_destroy (msg=0x868db40) at msg.c:160 >> #7 0x4007fb9c in outgoing_recv (orq=0x86b7ce8, status=487, >> msg=0x868db40, sip=0x868dbdc) at nta.c:8416 >> #8 0x40075dc3 in agent_recv_response (agent=0x8127d10, >msg=0x868db40, >> sip=0x868dbdc, tport_via=0x8128ea0, >> tport=0x8128f20) at nta.c:2656 >> #9 0x4007453a in agent_recv_message (agent=0x8127d10, >tport=0x8128f20, >> msg=0x868db40, tport_via=0x8128ea0, now= >> {tv_sec = 3406372299, tv_usec = 469809}) at nta.c:2177 >> #10 0x400e8620 in tport_base_deliver (self=0x8128f20, msg=0x868db40, >> now={tv_sec = 3406372299, tv_usec = 469809}) >> at tport.c:3010 >> #11 0x400e85c5 in tport_deliver (self=0x8128f20, msg=0x868db40, >> next=0x0, sc=0x0, now= >> {tv_sec = 3406372299, tv_usec = 469809}) at tport.c:2999 >> #12 0x400e8244 in tport_parse (self=0x8128f20, complete=1, >now={tv_sec = >> 3406372299, tv_usec = 469809}) at tport.c:2916 >> #13 0x400e8055 in tport_recv_event (self=0x8128f20) at tport.c:2858 >> #14 0x400e7dca in tport_base_wakeup (self=0x8128f20, events=1) at >> tport.c:2760 >> #15 0x400da20f in su_poll_port_wait_events (self=0x8126af8, >tout=38) at >> su_poll_port.c:590 >> #16 0x400d8598 in su_base_port_run (self=0x8126af8) at >> su_base_port.c:342 >> #17 0x400d120a in su_root_run (self=0x8127510) at su_port.h:310 >> #18 0x400d8e22 in su_pthread_port_clone_main (varg=0xbf5ff8ec) at >> su_pthread_port.c:321 >> #19 0x4014b0ce in pthread_start_thread (arg=0xbf3ffc00) at >manager.c:291 >> (gdb) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
