So, we can consider our patch or somethings like that a valid solution for this segfault?! :)
Thanks you very much. Happy Christmas and Happy New Year! Ge@@ru On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 15:13 +0200, Pekka Pessi wrote: > 2007/12/7, Ge@@ru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I try to use STUN feature of Sofia i have the following problem: > > > > If i try to destroy stun_handle_t (with stun_handle_destroy) inside > > stun_bind_cb there is always a segfault at row 2001 of stun.c file > > because sofia try to access to req variable after that req is been > > destroyed by stun_handle_destroy. So where we have to call > > stun_handle_destroy? > > Or however patch in attach seems resolve problem. > > Could be a valid solution patch attached? > > It is definitely better not to access anything in handle after > callback. I've modified most of the code not to use any handle-related > stuff after returning from callback. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
