Yes, I notice RFC 3261 leaves out port number in their SIP contact header examples. I guess I'm dealing with another odd SIP server. I'll just use the contact header tag for now and suggest to the SIP server people that they not require it.
Best Regards, Jerry -----Original Message----- From: Pekka Pessi [mailto:ppe...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 4:22 AM To: Jerry Richards Cc: sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Port Number in Contact Header 2009/1/27 Jerry Richards <jer...@tonecommander.com>: > I noticed sofia-sip leaves out the port number in the contact header. > The only way to include the port number in the Contact Header is to > use the > SIPTAG_CONTACT_HEADER_STR() tag. > > I'm just wondering if the sofia-sip default should be to include the > port number (e.g. <sip:192.168.72.100:5060>) instead of excluding it. What kind of benefit the explicit port number would have? Surely there is no device that can not cope with URLs without port numbers, right? -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
