I looked it up and yes I'm sure the 1024 is a Live 24 ... 

What you may want to consider is running the 1023 alongside the Delta
44 and use it as your main soundcard and also for any Digital Decoding
software and keep the Delta 44 strictly for serious purposes

I plan on getting one myself when I'm ready for it (I'm homebrewing a
couple of SDR designs) probably as an early Christmas present to
myself ... I do some home recording also and need a good card again
for that ... I had an Echo Darla but sold it because of lack of
support for WinXP, which was a shame because it had nearly as good a
dynamic range (98db) as the Delta 44 even though it only had 20 bit
ADCs ...

John

--- In [email protected], kd5nwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you sure the 1024i is the OEM version of the Live 24? I always 
> wondered why it sounded much better that the other 16 bit cards I 
> have. I have three of those cards, I may have a fourth somewhere.
> 
> After a lot of advice from people I have decided to wait on buying 
> anything until I can save enough for a Delta-44, I could maybe buy 
> one next week. I have a Audigy 2 ZS now, but I need to run it on a 
> faster PC. I've ordered a CPU chip upgrade to my best running PC that 
> is available.
> 
> Hopefully I will get the SR-40 in soon so I can do some real testing, 
> of all the cards I have the SB1024i runs with the least amount of CPU 
> usage. I also have three of them so they are in three different PC's 
> that I will test as soon as the SR-40 get here, I will also test the 
> other sound cards I have.
> 
> I have ordered a 2.8 GHz Dell and I will put the Delta in it. The 
> best sound card of the ones I have will end up in the best of the 
> three PC's on my workbench for doing experiments.
> 
> Funny thing is best on paper is not always best in the real world. Of 
> the three extra PC's I have, the one with the slowest clock (600MHz) 
> is faster that the other two (930MHz) by a long shot.
> 
> They all have fresh installs of Win2K same amount of memory 
> (identical SRAM), same video, same sound cards, same CPU (Pentium 
> III), yet the 600MHz runs with about 2/3 the CPU utilization as the 
> faster PC's. It must have a pretty mean motherboard, I purchased a 
> 1GHz chip for that PC ($27).
> 
> 
>





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to