Hi,

I found recently a chip of maxim; the max2314.

Input is possible from 40 -150 Mc and delivers an IQ signal.

Maybe this will help in getting to VHF.

73 Johan PA3GSB


--- In [email protected], KY1K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Alberto,
> 
> I've seen that switch, and it looks like the dead short or the 50 
ohm 
> termination is a problem. Since the switch does not  present a high 
> impedance during the time it's open, there is no way to avoid 
having 
> it discharge (or drain) the integrating caps, so they can't 
function 
> as a sample and hold.
> 
> Also notice that the turn on vs turn off time varies, it turns on 
in 
> 3.6 nS and it turns off in 5.8nS. This isn't going to work well 
since 
> 1 cycle of 144 MHz is 7 nS. While the switch passes 144 MHz, it 
won't 
> turn on and turn off fast enough to be usable at 144 MHz.
> 
> IF (and it's a big IF) we could slow down the on time transition, 
it 
> might be usable. If it would turn on in 5.8 nS and turn off in 5.8 
> nS, it would be good, provided the other switches could operate 
with 
> the same on and off times (switching times are all consistent).
> 
> I've chatted with AD about these issues, there is no way to burn 
out 
> the 50 ohm resistors to effectively remove them from the circuit. 
> There is no comparable analog switch made by them that does 
function 
> properly (for us). They are NOT planning or designing a suitable 
switch.
> 
> I talked to a friend who designs cmos about the consistency 
problem. 
> It is a relatively simple task to equalize the switching times IF 
> 'adjustability' is a design goal. But, it is very expensive to make 
> the masks necessary to do the fabrication of the parts. Without a 
> major demand for switches with consistent (equalized) on/off times, 
a 
> suitable switch will never be built.
> 
> I have some ideas about how to control the switching speeds and 
would 
> love to chat with anyone interested in QSD at vhf. Talk to me off 
> list, as the subject might be off topic for this group.
> 
> Art
> 
> 
> At 06:13 AM 10/23/2005, you wrote:
> 
> >I know that a few of you are considering the idea of building a QSD
> >directly at 144 MHz. I have just received an Analog Device 
bullettin
> >with the specs of a new high speed analog switch.
> >
> >Maybe it is worth investigating its suitability for that 
application.
> >
> 
>http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/Data_Sheets/847169922ADG901_2_b.p
df
> >
> >73  Alberto  I2PHD
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to