--- In [email protected], FRANCIS CARCIA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was just telling a lowfer friend about your radio also. he is part
5 on 137 KHz.
> 
> i2phd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:          --- In [email protected],
"Phil Covington" <p.covington@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Since the actual DSP is done in the PC, RX bandwidths less than 25 Hz
> > are possible. When I quoted 33 MHz to 1 kHz bandwidth I was stating
> > the I/Q data rate to the PC (similar to soundcard sampling rate). The
> > encode clock (whether 67 MHz or 133 MHz) is decimated to a much lower
> > rate within the on board FPGA and/or AD6620 DDC co-processors. This
> > rate can be as low as 1 kHz (or less) to the PC.
> > 
> > Phil N8VB
> >
> 
> Phil,
> 
> quite interesting, and congratulations for this new achievement. Is
> the 100 kHz lower frequency limit dictated by some constraints, or
> would it be possible to go down to e.g. 500 Hz, as the SDR-IQ does ?
> That would be quite interesting both for ELF/VLF/LF reception and for
> other uses, like bat detectors, etc.
> 
> And, have you fixed any tentative price range yet ?
> 
> 73 Alberto I2PHD

Alberto,

The lower frequency limit is determined by the Minicircuits T1-6T RF
transformer in the front end. Theoretically it should be good down to
about 15 kHz, but I wanted to err on the side of caution by stating
100 kHz.  The SDR-IQ uses an active PGA/ADC driver that sacrifices
noise for lower frequency response (almost down to DC).  

I would think a better solution to people who want to receive below
100 - 250 kHz would be to use Analog's 2.5 MSPS 24 bit ADC.  It has
very impressive dynamic range below 100 kHz bandwidths.

I will post more pricing info in a few weeks.  I will probably have a
few different options based on the particular ADC used and how many
DDC co-processors are populated.  I intend to support the LTC2205/6/7
and LTC2208/9 16/14 bit parts as well as some of the Analog Devices 14
bit and 16 bit ADCs.  The pricing will probably be similar to the
SDR-IQ and the USRP motherboard.

I am also in the process of developing the open source software that
will be used with the QS1R.  The application will be called QSRunner
and is likely to use GTK+ for Windows and Linux GUIs.  The DSP will
likely use DttSP or an adaptation of it for the processing engine.

73 de Phil N8VB



Reply via email to