--- In [email protected], "Ross Stenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dan, if you can get Win2K it is much less resource intensive than XP > on an older machine. > > 73 Ross K9COX
Well, I have both XP Pro and Win2K on the same PC, with a triple boot (add Linux) managed by Boot Magic, and I would say that perhaps I find XP snappier than Win2k on the very same hardware... I haven't performed any measurements, just my impression... the fact that my PC has plenty of RAM and it is rather fast can play its role, though... 73 Alberto I2PHD
