--- In [email protected], "cesco12342000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would suggest you to also post the information >> to the Winrad Yahoo group, or, in case you are not subscribed, >> I can do it for you, with your permission. > > I did think this is the winrad group ... guess im in the wrong > place then.
Cesco, unless you did that under another user name, I am unable to find on the Winrad group on Yahoo a message from you announcing your DLL. Maybe the post didn't went through ok. > >> When your DLL will be completely debugged and stable, if you want I >> can add it to the DLLs available from my Web site > > It might never be "completely debugged and stable", i stop > debugging when i think it's good enough for me. Open Source, > naturally. Fine. When you think you won't work anymore on it, tell me please and I will place it on my Web site. > > The idea behind this is to use your interface specification not > only for winrad, but for other sdr programs as well. There is no > point in developping the code to access hardware over and over > again. A common interface would enable all sdr programs to talk > with all hardware. This is really a very good idea. If every SDR program would "talk" in a unique. standardized way to the external hardware, many problems would disappear... > > This is why i started to make dll's for the softrock according to > winrad specification. btw I also have some questions of things i > dont understand. I am available to give explanations on my specs about the DLL interfacing, if you think you need them. 73 Alberto I2PHD
