I2PHD wrote: >I suppose you meant SDRadio, not Winrad. I haven't distributed the >Winrad source code to anybody, before.
Correct. Meant to say SDRadio -Ray WB6TPU ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of i2phd Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 9:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [soft_radio] Re: Winrad source, where do we stand. --- In [email protected] <mailto:soft_radio%40yahoogroups.com> , Ray Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John- > > A couple years ago I compiled the Winrad code (version 0.95 I think) > using Borland C++ Builder V6. I suppose you meant SDRadio, not Winrad. I haven't distributed the Winrad source code to anybody, before. No surprise SDRadio compiled correctly. It was developed with the Borland C++Builder V6, the same that you used, and never ported to a more recent environment. Between C++Builder V6 and the CodeGear Rad Studio 2007 there are some differences, but not many. One of them being that the function Synchronize now wants an explicit address-of. Synchronize(myfunc); // valid with the C++Builder V6 Synchronize(&myfunc); // valid with the CodeGear compiler But that is just a minor point. I had to rebuild the package too, as letting the compiler do the upgrading did result in some errors. About the Turbo C++ Express, I don't know if it will fit. I do not have installed, so cannot check myself. 73 Alberto I2PHD This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.
