Leif

Actually I think you are over thinking this. The signal is really DSB 
with one sideband being only a couple hundred hertz so it is not a new 
mode. This would permit a Costas Loop to lock the received signal upon 
reception. I already have speech processing so it really boils down to 
two audio channels and two Hilbert transforms ouput as a single I/Q so I 
dont know where all the power and filtering, etc comes in..It just feeds 
a Softrock the same as any other mode of operation.. It could be 
included one of many existing SDR programs. ISB is and has been a real 
mode for many decades. As I mentioned, ISB  is already on the list of 
features to be added to the PowerSDR software if one wanted to wait.
Actually after my last post yesterday I did it with one Hilbert 
transform and barely any more CPU processing than for SSB. After I 
finish my experiments using a computer test bed, it will be 
professionally coded into an ASIC.



Leif Asbrink wrote:

>On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:43:12 -0400
>w2xj <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>A brief description is that I really want to create a VSB signal where 
>>the information is the same on both sides and must be in sync. The 
>>technical answer is much more complex.. I do not see a user interface 
>>issue, just another mode button on the GUI. Then the left sound card 
>>input is lower sideband and the right is upper or a stereo wave file 
>>would contain upper and lower sideband in the left and right audio 
>>channels.
>>    
>>
>??????????
>
>Why do you think it is a good idea to use the two audio channels
>to generate VSB? 
>
>It seems to me that the signal you want to transmit is generated 
>by a computer. It seems natural to me that you would generate
>it as a single channel audio signal of twice the bandwidth to make
>it fit a SSB transmitter with suitable bandwidth.
>
>What you ask for would be a new transmit mode without any speech
>processing. There has to be filtering, power regulation, amplitude
>and phase balance and other things. I would not consider it without 
>an understanding of the technical details that would motivate such
>a mode.
>
>73
>
>Leif / SM5BSZ
>
>
>  
>

Reply via email to