Hi Pete,

I had a similar experience, got several AD9851 DDS boards here in various 
signal generator and VFO projects. 

They do work well, but when I first used them, I was surprised to see just how 
many spurs appear as you tune across a range of frequencies, and some are 
pretty big as well!

That's why it was really nice to try the Si570, and see how good the output 
was, just a pity it costs that bit more.

I wish you success with your project and venture. Nice to see an ever 
increasing range of SDR hardware becoming available. I suspect there is a good 
market for a ready constructed module as many find it too hard to cope with 
building using SMD components.

73, Bob G8VOI

--- In [email protected], "ni9n" <peg...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> Thanks, Bob!  I was a little surprised when I started experimenting with the 
> AD9834 to find all the spurs it produced, especially above one-quarter of the 
> master clock frequency.  When I figured out why the DDS generates spurs, I 
> quickly came up with a way to nearly eliminate them.  It's really the only 
> thing about the LD-1 that's proprietary.  
> 
> --- In [email protected], "g8voip" <g8voi.reeves59@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kelvin,
> > 
> > Just a trivial point. 
> > 
> > The Si570 is not actually a DDS device, uses a completely different method 
> > of generating the final frequency. The net result is that the Si570 has a 
> > much clearer output spectrum, and none of the spurs usually associated with 
> > DDS chips, also the Si570 has lower phase noise.
> > 
> > Although it does cost a little more, certainly worth it.
> > 
> > It has has become the 'standard' oscillator source now for a number of 
> > different SDR projects.
> > 
> > 73, Bob G8VOI
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "kcmuthumani" <kelvinm@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Pete.
> > > 
> > > This SDR looks very nice, before I order one do you have some specs on 
> > > the unit ? I was wondering if you are going to post the schematics 
> > > online. I could not find it on your web site. Also what DDS chip are you 
> > > using Si570 ? or Analog Devices chip ?
> > > 73
> > > Kelvin
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to