Hello ni9n!
 
I've a question about your receiver: Do you use a kind of Swichting Mixer,
sometimes called Tayloe Detector? Or ist it classic single or dual
conversion? It would be interesting if you would post some more information
about the bandpasses like which order they are.
 
73, Stephan
 
 
 


  _____  

Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im
Auftrag von ni9n
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Januar 2010 02:12
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [soft_radio] LD-1 Discussion on Garage-shoppe.com Blog


  

Thanks to those who have placed orders for or expressed interest in the LD-1
software defined receiver, which I am now shipping. Two of the first lot of
five are still available (I will be assembling them in the morning, so they
don't show up as in stock yet) and I have just ordered parts for the second
lot. Those should be ready to ship later in the week. 

To recap the LD-1's features (which are fully described at
www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1home.htm ) it is a soundcard-based SDR like
the Softrock-40 and similar SDR's, but with a dual-DDS local oscillator
using two Analog Devices AD9834 DDS chips. It will cover the entire 530 kHz
to 30+ MHz range. On the low end it will probably work below 530 kHz, but I
haven't tested it there. It may go as high as 37 MHz, but I haven't tried
that, eiter. It is USB controlled, either from Winrad or from its own
stand-alone application. While I haven't done any formal performance
measurements, it seems very comparable to my FT-817. Except, of course,
being an SDR it runs rings around any conventional receiver when it comes to
operator convenience and agility.

I don't want to distract from the main topic of this discussion group, so I
would like to encourage anyone who is interested in the LD-1, or DIY
surface-mount projects, small-scale product developement, ham radio
entrepreneurship, etc. to visit my blog at www.garage-shoppe.com.





Eingehende eMail ist virenfrei.
Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de
Version: 9.0.730 / Virendatenbank: 271.1.1/2639 - Ausgabedatum: 01/23/10
20:33:00


Reply via email to