Mikko Mäkinen schrieb: > Hi, > > are there any plans on improving the deinterlace-feature of softdevice? > I mean like "integrating" for example TomsMoComp or Greedy2Frame > deinterlacers... Or is this even easily possible? >
In fact I tried a lot of different deinterlacing algorithms for the softdevice, and I still have the code lying around... I read a lot about the quality of TomsMoComp, but when I tried it with xine, it mainly produced a lot of noise and left some interlacing artifacts on my test clips. Maybe I didn't get the parameters right... Can someone tell me which options I have to use to get less noise? Integrating TomsMoComp into the softdevice is for me not an option. I checked it once, but it seems that tvtime uses the windows dlls and xine uses tvtime, so there is no linux port of the deinterlacers. Also the deinterlacer works on the yuy pixelformat, so that we would have to do format conversion. If someone wants to try and experiment with the deinterlacers I wrote, I can send a patch. But currently most options are only changeable by changing the code, so some C skills are necessary to see all the features. Currently I have an equivalent to Greedy2Frame, and two more advanced deinterlacers one detects motion, and the other detects interlacing effects to know where to deinterlace. The actual deinterlacing can be done by several algorithms, one smoothing deinterlacer, a sharpening and one edge detecting (a bit like TomsMoComp or GreedyH) and others. Bye, Martin Bye, Martin _______________________________________________ Softdevice-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/softdevice-devel
