Graham - thanks for raising it.

Chris - I think the initial post on the mailing list was fairly successful
and well received, and it did put a number of minds at rest. However, the
amount of softimage users that read the mailing list is in the minority,
and the most visible source of information since then has been the
cgchannel news article, hence it's caused a bit of a stir among the less
well-informed users out there.

I appreciate the actions not words sentiment, and all your hard work with
bug fixes and community engagement so far, looking forward to seeing what
the new team bring to the table.

Regards,
Matt



On 4 May 2012 13:33, Graham Bell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Following Matts post about the cgchannel article, I have highlighted the
> issue with someone high up and the mixed messages its sends out.
>
> Whether anything will happen, I don't know. But I raised the concern about
> the mixed messages this type of thing gives out.
>
> G
>
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Juhani Karlsson
> Sent: 04 May 2012 13:14
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: CgChannel coverage
>
> Thats a good attitude! ; )
>
> - Juhani
> 2012/5/4 Chris Chia <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>>
> Hi Matt,
> That must decided by the higher management. Anyway, i believe ChunPong has
> introduced his team to ease the panic in the mailing list a while ago.
> Despite that, users still make a lot of assumption. I think we can only
> prove to them by actions (instead of words).
>
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
>
> On 4 May, 2012, at 8:03 PM, "Matt Morris" <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>
> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> the article makes a lot of assumptions based on the information that came
> out in the mailing list. An official announcement/press release might help?
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>
> On 4 May 2012 12:27, Chris Chia <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>>> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> Thanks for the link. I have googled that too. Guess we will have to work
> harder to prove to the Softimage community to gain their faith.
>
>
> Regards,
> Chris Chia
> Softimage QA Analyst
> Autodesk Media & Entertainment
>
> On 4 May, 2012, at 7:22 PM, "Matt Morris" <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]
> >><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:
>
> Sorry a link would help eh ;)
>
>
> http://www.cgchannel.com/2012/05/autodesk-reshuffles-softimage-development-team/
>
>
> On 4 May 2012 12:14, Chris Chia <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>>>> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> Thanks for bringing that out.
> Could you provide us with the link?
> And please rest assured that we are a far bigger team.
>
>
> Regards,
> Chris Chia
> Softimage QA Analyst
> Autodesk Media & Entertainment
>
> On 4 May, 2012, at 5:46 PM, "Matt Morris" <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]
> >><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>><mailto:[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]
> ><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just a quick one, the post at cgchannel covering the changing team has the
> phrase ' six-person team '. This seems to be a bit misleading (people think
> its 6 developers total working on Softimage) and is freaking people out a
> bit - it would be great if someone from Autodesk could ask them to rephrase
> that statement, as it's spreading quickly via twitter and the like.
>
> Other than that its an even piece.
>
> matt
>
>
> --
> www.matinai.com<http://www.matinai.com><http://www.matinai.com><
> http://www.matinai.com><http://www.matinai.com>
>
>
>
> --
> www.matinai.com<http://www.matinai.com><http://www.matinai.com><
> http://www.matinai.com>
>
>
>
> --
> www.matinai.com<http://www.matinai.com><http://www.matinai.com>
>
>


-- 
www.matinai.com

Reply via email to