Are you sure those are the recommended versions to be working with? I'd check the versions that the default Softimage is using and reflect that. Last I heard 2.7 wasn't running 100% and that pywin32 214 was required as a bug in the version after concerning a memory leak was yet to be fixed too. Maybe Mr. Blair has a better idea. He's still Softimage support to me.
-------------------------------------------- Eric Thivierge http://www.ethivierge.com On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Tim Crowson <[email protected] > wrote: > Yep, that's what I'm using. Pywin32 64-bit (in this case, build 217, > athough I see 218 is out). The installer is " > pywin32-217.win-amd64-py2.7.exe<http://sourceforge.net/projects/pywin32/files/pywin32/Build%20217/pywin32-217.win-amd64-py2.7.exe/download> > " > http://sourceforge.net/projects/pywin32/files/pywin32/Build%20217/ > > Again, this has been working fine on my workstation for weeks. And we're > not finding anything particularly special to differentiate my setup from > other workstations. >
