Clever. Not that I've needed strings for much insofar, but I hadn't thought of that approach.
Thanks Andy On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Andy Nicholas <[email protected]>wrote: > You can do it without a loop, but you have to specify a character that > you know > will never be in the string whose length you're testing. > > See attached image. Pretty sure it works for all cases. > > A > > >
