That entirely depends on the use-case. Arnold is in faster most raycasting situations, but 3Delight will be faster for for example motion graphics or character animations with unrealistic shading. And even then it can very much depend on the complexity of the scene and on of what kind that complexity is. Then there is also the aspect of artist time spent to get to that render-time, which - depending on how easy it is to get from the default state to the final render state - can wildly differ in between the different renderers and shots. The speed of a renderer in a production is a very complex metric and can't really be summarized into a simple statement like "Arnold is faster than 3Delight".
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Christopher < [email protected]> wrote: > Is it as fast as Arnold :) ? > > > Morten Bartholdy wrote: > > Looks interesting Greg. Two questions: > > 1. What is your hardware setup ? > > 2. Could you upload it in higher resolution so we can read the menus? > > > MB > > > > > Den 28. maj 2013 kl. 15:37 skrev Gregory Ducatel > <[email protected]><[email protected]>: > > > Hi Guys, > > In case you did not had a chance to look into the next version of 3dfs, > here is a little test I did. > > http://vimeo.com/66105781 > > Cheers, > > Greg > > > > >
