Have you tried VBScript? I usually do my envelope related scripts in VBScript because it is way faster than JScript (my main scripting language).
VBScript selection(0).Envelopes(0).Weights.Array is faster than JScript new VBArray( selection(0).Envelopes(0).Weights.Array ) and way way more faster than JScript selection(0).envelopes(0).Weights.Array.toArray() I don't use Python, but in my tests, Python has been the slowest of the three when dealing with envelopes, subcomponent arrays and a bunch of loops. M.Yara On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Eric Thivierge <[email protected]>wrote: > This takes even longer ~ 14 seconds. I really seems the slowness is > simply accessing envelopeOp.Weights.Array. > > Any devs paying attention that could confirm that this is just a slow > call? Would doing these operations in C++ be the only way to speed them up? > > > # Python > # ============================================= > from platform import system as OStype > from time import clock > > xsi = Application > log = xsi.LogMessage > sel = xsi.Selection > > start_time = clock() > > envelopeOp = sel(0).Envelopes(0) > weightsTuple = envelopeOp.Weights.Array > weights = [weightsTuple[j][i] for i in xrange(len(weightsTuple[0])) for j > in xrange(len(weightsTuple))] > > > timeTaken = clock() - start_time > > units = ["seconds" if OStype() is "Windows" else "milliseconds"][0] > msg = "It took "+str(timeTaken)+" "+units+" to process your code." > > log(msg) > # ============================================= > > > Eric Thivierge > =============== > Character TD / RnD > Hybride Technologies > > > On 31/05/2013 3:00 AM, Bartosz Opatowiecki wrote: > > Also: > > def getWeights(envelopeOp): > weightsTuple = envelopeOp.Weights.Array > return [weightsTuple[j][i] for i in range(len(weightsTuple[0])) for j in > range(len(weightsTuple))] > > xrange should be more efficient than range.... > > >
