yep, i get that... i think there is room for a lightweight and free plugin
with minimal dependencies. alembic is surely a beast to compile.


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Alan Fregtman <[email protected]>wrote:

> Gene can speak for himself but I get the vibe he's probably going for
> simplicity, much like how OBJ is the simplest static mesh format and
> because it's so incredibly easy to write out, it's so widely used (even if
> there's a few extras that not all exporters/importers handle, but the core
> stuff works.)
>
> Using Alembic would be smart, no doubt, but the complexity it brings in
> terms of managing compilation on multiple platforms outweighs the
> portability of a potentially simpler spec that's easy to write and
> relatively easy to read. Filesize-wise compression can be used regardless.
> I don't see that as a concern.
>
> Anyway, that's my opinion. What are your thoughts on this, Gene?
>

Reply via email to