Tried to install software on windows 8 today and got nothing but error msgs
and crashes. Finally reinstalled with windows 7 and it all works great.

Sent from my phone.
On Aug 21, 2013 3:06 PM, "Sven Constable" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Then it's not a farm but a barn. A renderbarn. :)****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Andres Stephens
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:17 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Windows 7 or 8****
>
> ** **
>
> I use both W7 and W8 on a render my farm, my farm is like a motely crew of
> pirates, all random computers. =P ****
>
>  ****
>
> -Draise****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Angus Davidson
> *Sent:* ‎Wednesday‎, ‎August‎ ‎21‎, ‎2013 ‎08‎:‎34‎ ‎
> *To:* [email protected]****
>
>  ****
>
> Hi All****
>
> ** **
>
> I am looking at imaging our render farm (mac mini's running bootcamp). I
> have a very nice workflow via win clone pro . I can using Apple Remote
> Desktop  pump out the images as mac packages  to any of the mac on the
> network and it automatically installs bootcamp and the windows therein. (I
> just need to change the machine name, and activate windows and I am good to
> go)****
>
> ** **
>
> The only problem I have is that even for the base windows 7 install the
> uncompressed image is about 20Gigs in size.  Add the packages I need on it
> to render  and it grows again.****
>
> ** **
>
> Windows 8 has a much smaller footprint upfront. (8Gigs)****
>
> ** **
>
> Which leads to my question. Has anyone had experience with using a windows
> 8 based render farm vs a windows 7 one. I must admit I am more comfortable
> in windows 7, But having a much more optimised image is also a great thing
> when your doing a lot of deployments.****
>
> ** **
>
> Kind regards****
>
> ** **
>
> Angus****
>
> This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is confidential.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
> immediately and destroy the original message. You may not copy or
> disseminate this communication without the permission of the University.
> Only authorised signatories are competent to enter into agreements on
> behalf of the University and recipients are thus advised that the content
> of this message may not be legally binding on the University and may
> contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which are not
> necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the Witwatersrand,
> Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and outsiders are
> subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in writing to the
> contrary. ****
>
> ** **
>

Reply via email to