Hi Guillaume, You sure know who to send to to troubleshoot your custom node. Mind sending it to them?
Chris On 27 Sep, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Guillaume Laforge <guillaume.laforge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, SP2 fixed the ICE instance memory issue in SiToA I think. > So it does not make sense to use 2014 SP1 as we are using Arnold. > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Stephen Blair <stephenrbl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Maybe you should try compiling against SP1 and see if that crashes too. > In SP2, wasn't there just that one SDK change for ICE array access, which > broke binary compatibility? > > > On 27/09/2013 10:37 AM, Guillaume Laforge wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I compiled a custom ICE node for 2014 SP2 and it crash all the time (It >> works perfectly in 2013 QF7). >> As this node is rather complicated and call external libraries, it is not >> easy to send it to support (and I don't have the time right now to isolate >> the problem in a simpler code). >> Because of that we are staying in 2013 for the production. >> >> I'm wondering if other users got similar issue with custom ICE node in SP2 ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Guillaume Laforge >> >> >> -------------------------- >> To unsubscribe: mail softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with subject >> "unsubscribe" and reply to the confirmation email. > > > -------------------------- > To unsubscribe: mail softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with subject > "unsubscribe" and reply to the confirmation email. > > -------------------------- > To unsubscribe: mail softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with subject > "unsubscribe" and reply to the confirmation email.
-------------------------- To unsubscribe: mail softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with subject "unsubscribe" and reply to the confirmation email.
