Reading all the oldies but goodies, and also being a guy that was born the
year the man put a feet on the moon, without any supercomputer,  I am more
convinced that I don“t need a nice viewport to get the job done... hahaha




2013/12/23 Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES] <[email protected]>

> By todays standards almost everything was low end back then in regards to
> quality, but it was all superior to the slide rules we were using in the
> 60s and 70s! :)
>
> I too recall extracting dos batch file programming code one word at a time
> from a mag called DOS Resource Guide and then rewriting it into something
> useful.
>
> And the basic programming had to be done by swapping the Basic floppy
> disks with OS floppy disks etc because the PC had no hard drives. Fun
> indeed.
>
> --
> Joey Ponthieux
> __________________________________________________
> Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not
> represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Harriss
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 9:53 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: positivity
>
> A bit... But there are plenty of you guys here that don't make me feel so
> old! ;) My first machine was a TRS-80 that I got sometime around 1977. Did
> some graphics, learned basic, played really bad games.
>
> 10 Print "Cheese and Monkeys! ";
> 20 Goto 10
>
> Lol.
> So much fun.
>
> I remember getting magazines with programs in them.
> The tedious typing to get them in the machine.
> The tearing them apart to make them do things that were "more fun" ;)
>
> Ed
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ponthieux, Joseph
> G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES]
> Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 9:46 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: positivity
>
> Hey Ed,
>
> Do you still feel old? :-)
>
> Joey
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] [
> [email protected]] on behalf of Graham D. Clark [
> [email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 12:36 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: positivity
>
> Thanks Adrian for keeping it positive, we use Softimage for most of the
> features Stereo D is on.
>
> I use Soft to prototype tools outside of soft, for other programs and
> onset tools. Plan to keep using it for the foreseeable future. Can't say I
> said that about the Commodore PET I started on in 1980.
> Cheers
> --
> Graham D Clark, Head of Stereography, Deluxe 3D dba Stereo D
> phone: why-I-stereo
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/grahamclark
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Meng-Yang Lu <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>> wrote:
> 1983 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lite-Brite
>
> Did I win?  :P
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES] <
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I can say I miss the cheese and monkeys humor and do wonder what Porl is
> up to these days.
> But as for old.... Maybe we should have a contest.
>
> What's the oldest computer graphics system you worked on, and the year?
> It doesn't have to be 3D, it can be 2d, print, video, layout, etc. It just
> had to be a computer than did any kind of graphics.
>
> Takers?
>
> --
> Joey Ponthieux
> __________________________________________________
> Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not
> represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.
>
> From: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]> [mailto:
> [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 2:24 PM
> To: softimage@listproc. autodesk. com
> Subject: Re: positivity
>
> Ha ha yeah Ed, you're old. But dang, so am I.
>
> Sent from my HTC EVO 4G LTE exclusively from Sprint
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Ed Harriss" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> To: "[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>>
> Subject: positivity
> Date: Fri, Dec 20, 2013 2:07 PM
>
> Maybe we need to go back to a multi-address list system like we had in the
> old days. There was the discussion list, which was all
> fun/monkeys/cheese/Porl and there was the Softimage list, which is pretty
> much what we are using now. There were even other lists like eddie,
> particle, etc.. (Yea, I'm old..) Anyway, we could have this list stay a
> Softimage list and create another one for all the gloom and doom.
>
> Perfect!
>
> Now get to work Autodesk listproc person! ;) Thanks!
>
> Happy Holidays!
> Ed "cheese and monkeys" Harriss
>
> From: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]> [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kris Rivel
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 1:33 PM
> To: Softimage List
> Subject: Re: positivity
>
> Ha ha...Merry Christmas to all!!  LOL.  I'm not trying to start
> anything...just want to see if I'm the only one hearing this.  I told the
> guys that told me to go tell the people that said this to go F themselves
> for what its worth.  It does piss me off to see rumors like this but....I
> do sit at home mostly working all day and night.  I don't get to mingle
> with my peers as much as I used to so I didn't know if this may be old news
> or something new.  Sounds bunk so I'll leave it at that :-)
>
> Kris
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Eric Thivierge <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Only thing I have beef with myself is the thread hijacking that snowballs
> into a long slog of boohooism. I'm tired of it. In recent times I have to
> think twice about posting to the list because I'm afraid my thread will get
> pulled into the black hole of negativity and what could have been a helpful
> / informative thread will be turned into a bitch-fest.
>
> The emPolygonizer thread yesterday that was heading in that direction
> seriously almost made me unsubscribe.
>
> If you want to complain about the demise of a software, have at it. Just
> stop hijacking threads with it (not aimed specifically Mr. Lampi, in
> general)..
>
> - Eric T.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to