sorry for dragging this out but i am not budging from this.

i don't buy the excuse for not asking questions... i am not talking about
this list. how about on the site that hosts the plugin?
https://github.com/caron/PyQtForSoftimage/issues

brace yourself for candidness. i am taking the position that 'a lot of
artists' you mention are lazy. not stupid... lazy. they gave up waaay to
early. i have given a lot to this community (and have received a lot too)
to avoid it from 'dying', so please don't suggest my lack of documentation
is some how damaging one's perception of the community.

you say you are appreciative but it just keeps irking me when you say 'a
lot of artists'... i see it as a made up number to get an effect. surely
you know these artist and surely you could have helped them when the
originally had the issue? maybe by posting on this list for them?

in the mean time, i gave more of my free time to update the documentation.
i hope it is satisfactory... i you could test these instructions and maybe
reach out to those artists who couldn't get it to work before. if they
still have issues, use the issues page on the github site.

https://github.com/caron/PyQtForSoftimage



On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Angus Davidson
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  Just changed the topic to merge the threads
>
>  Firstly there are a lot of artists out there trying to use these tools
> that sit on top of PyQt.  Not many manage to get them to work because of
> the installation documentation. Personally I think the sweet spot is a
> compromise between yours and Erics views. Developers who make use of your
> plugin should have pushed harder to get the document changes made if they
> were not going to include it in their documentation,.
>
>  Not many of them have access to this list so unless they know some who
> does they end up not being able to use the tool. This adds to the
> perception that Softimage is dying because the things are not working.
> Going on to state that they cant install it because they are stupid is also
> a very bad position to take. It doesnt help anyone in the greater Softimage
> community.
>
>  I think what you guys do is amazing and please dont take this as
> anything more then just trying to get more people to be able to use the
> tools with a minimum of hassle.
>
>
>

Reply via email to