Hi Octavian, i used a couple of times skanect for people or indoor sets and must say its a time saver. If you can, give it a try!
Francisco. On Wednesday, January 29, 2014, Octavian Ureche <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting topic here. > Was just testing agisoft photoscan for some non commercial related work, > and it seems to give pretty nice results with minimal user input. > Has anyone tried to compare a kinekt based approach such as skanect ( > http://skanect.manctl.com) with a photogrammetrical approach for object > scanning? > > I am curious about the pros and cons of both. > > Cheers, > O > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Ed Manning > <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > > wrote: > >> Recap and 123D Catch from Autodesk do very well with some subject matter. >> >> NukeX also has camera tracking, point-could generation and meshing, and >> can export geo and camera. >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau < >> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', >> '[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> Hello friends, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am currently investigating photogrammetry and would love to get your >>> advices, opinions, experiences with such systems. >>> >>> What hardware do you use? Which software? Best practices? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you for any info! >>> >>> MAC >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: >>> cid:[email protected]]<https://mdc-web-tomcat17.ubisoft.org/confluence/display/technologygroup/Home+Passenger> >>> >>> *Marc-André Carbonneau* >>> >>> Product Specialist >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Octavian Ureche > +40 732 774 313 (GMT+2) > Animation & Visual Effects > www.okto.ro >
<<image001.jpg>>
