Nice fix Stephen. That seems to do it. Didn't even think about legacy RBD's. The simulation environment I had active didn't have a simulation time control.. I've never run into a case where its been deleted before, wonder what would do that? Thanks Man!
Adam On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Stephen Blair <[email protected]>wrote: > Something is messed up with your Simulation Environment. > http://screencast.com/t/MeWw3nkE8S4 > > Try creating a new environment (Create > Rigid Body > Environment) and if > that works, making it the default. > > Or maybe you need to runonce.bat or restart > Softimage<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/xsi_list/error$20when$20creating$20a$20simulated$20ice$20tree%7Csort:relevance/xsi_list/t8iBONMm3cI/G0265kPFpk4J> > . > > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Eric Thivierge <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Sorry it wasn't clear, is this only happening in relation to Momentum or >> ALL simulated ICE Trees you're trying to create even those not involving >> Momentum. >> >> Eric T. >> >> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:27:32 PM, Adam Sale wrote: >> >>> I have never had an issue creating a simulated ICE tree before, but >>> last night this bit me on a scene, and I haven't been able to shake it. >>> Running runonce.bat, deleting prefs hasn't worked. >>> >>> ' ERROR : 21000 - Unspecified failure - [line 654 in C:\Program >>> Files\Autodesk\Softimage 2014 SP2\Application\DSScripts\operators.vbs] >>> >>> To clarify, I am using Momentum on this, and using ICE controls to >>> drive my Momentum sim. Up until last night, I had never had any issues >>> with this, but now all of a sudden, any time I try to create a simmed >>> ICE tree, on anything Momentum, I get the above. >>> >>> Creating a regular modeling ICE tree is no issue. The exact line that >>> is referenced,line 654 seems to reference timecontrols, but I don't >>> understand how that would affect the creation of a simulation region >>> on a point cloud. >>> >>> Searches aren't yielding any fruit. Has anyone run into this and found >>> a way to get rid of the issue? >>> >>> Adam >>> >>> >> >
