Made a Houdini thread:
http://www.sidefx.com/index.php?option=com_forum&Itemid=172&page=viewtopic&t=30999

Cheers


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Mladen Kevic <mladen.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> well they didn't change XSI that much in last few years, so i don't see
> reason to switch the software now. More/less if i have Arnold, Redshift,
> Gear in Softimage XSI 7.5 i wouldn't have that much reason to upgrade to
> autodesk at all.
>
> So that SI will miss some minor upgrades in next few years, doesn't affect
> me too much. I just hope that third part developers won't stop developing
> their very cool stuff witch makes SI still best option on market.
>
> Current version of Softimage if it remain in AVID would probably be XSI
> 8.5 or in best case XSI 9 :)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:03 PM, <pete...@skynet.be> wrote:
>
>>   for what its worth, same thing happened with the transition from SI3D
>> to XSI.
>> at the time of the SPM dongles, customers had to send back the old flexlm
>> dongles (or the paperwork to testify the Irix license managers were no
>> longer functional) in order to get permanent SPM licenses.
>> It wasn't enforced everywhere though.
>>
>>  *From:* adrian wyer <adrian.w...@fluid-pictures.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 04, 2014 6:51 PM
>> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>> *Subject:* RE: Softimage transition audience poll
>>
>>  im guessing they don't want you to have 2 production apps for the price
>> of one, basically admitting that a two year old Soft will be AT LEAST as
>> productive as Maya 2016
>>
>> a
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
>> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Ben Rogall
>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 17:42
>> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>> *Subject:* Re: Softimage transition audience poll
>>
>>  Yep. Or $4495 for a workstation license and then $2495 per year. For a
>> minute there it looked like Autodesk was doing something half reasonable
>> with the free transition offer to Softimage + Maya. But then I saw that
>> accepting that means that I would not be allowed to use Softimage at all
>> after February 2016. I'm not even sure what Autodesk gains from that.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> On 3/4/2014 11:00 AM, Francois Lord wrote:
>>
>> What I find interesting in the fact that people want to jump the Autodesk
>> boat is that they seem to forget they have to buy a new software.
>> For a company that relies entirely on Softimage, that decision is not a
>> cheap one. Houdini is 7000$ for a floating license plus 4000$ per year!
>>
>> http://www.sidefx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=385&Itemid=190
>>
>> In two years when Bifrost will be nearing maturity, Maya will become a
>> lot more appealing if you stay on subscription. Be kind with your bean
>> counter.
>>
>> just sayin.
>>
>> On 04-Mar-14 11:37, Alan Fregtman wrote:
>>
>> I've set up a poll out of curiosity...
>>
>> *Where will you transition to when Softimage falls?* Vote!
>>
>> http://strawpoll.me/1257710
>>
>> (Multiple-choice allowed btw.)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
[img]http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s202/animatics/avatar_1.gif[/img]

Reply via email to