+1 So this is for real? Do it! :)
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Bk <p...@bustykelp.com> wrote: > Id they don't show, we could pretend we *are* Autodesk and make an > official statement that we are proud to reintroduce Softimage as the > flagship product to our portfolio of digital content creation tools. > > > > > On 19 Mar 2014, at 21:47, Matt Lind <ml...@carbinestudios.com> wrote: > > The past few years they had a booth and no user group meeting. Last year > they reversed course and had a user group meeting, but no booth. > > What they do this year remains to be seen. > > > Matt > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto: > softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Rob Chapman > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:31 PM > To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > Subject: Re: Softimage webinar - Q/A - finally uploaded > > were Autodesk actually at Siggraph last year..? will they be there this > year? > > http://forums.cgsociety.org/archive/index.php/t-1112659.html > > > > On 19 March 2014 21:20, Perry Harovas <perryharo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If this actually happens, I love the fact that Autodesk created this > > problem for themselves on the Siggraph show floor, where they always > > think they are king. > > > The other funny part is, they could have screwed us just like they > > did, but if they handled it far different (meaning with humility and > > care), this may not have become such a shit storm. > > > OK, it still would have, but we perhaps wouldn't be discussing things > > like this (and hopefully doing them)... > > > They are doing the equivalent of walking along a wooden bridge with an > > automatic rifle, just shooting at the wood in front of them, thinking > > it will get rid of Softimage as well as impress everyone else with the > > fireworks, but all it is doing is weakening the bridge and the bridge > > will eventually snap. > > > >
