Agree 100%
Le 25/03/2014 19:01, Jean-Louis Billard a écrit :
Hi Andres,
Unfortunately Chris already explained that, and it makes sense: AD
have to pay for third parties libraries. It’s not worth it for them
given the small revenue stream.
I think we’re collectively tripping if we think we are going to get AD
to revoke their decision.
What we need to do now (for those, like me, who want to stay with
Soft) is to make sure we keep using it to create great work, generate
enough demand for third parties to invest time in developing for it,
and just keep having fun using a great piece of software for the years
to come until a credible solution comes along and gives us the
opportunity to move on in a graceful way.
Regards,
Jean-Louis
Jean-Louis Billard
Digital Golem
BE: +32 (0) 484 263 563
UK: +44 (0) 7973 660 119
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.digitalgolem.com/
53 Rue Gustave Huberti
1030 Brussels
On 25 Mar 2014, at 18:51, Andres Stephens <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Why are you refusing a sale to studios who want to invest years into
a product you already have, coded and no-longer need to develop much?
