PySide isn't completely dead. But it would really need a company that is actively maintaining it, like it had before. Luc-Eric, why don't AD get together with The Foundry and invest some time and money into the UI framework we all use and rely on?
/Jens On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Sajjad Amjad <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Alok, > I'm curious about where you're getting information about development of > PySide. When I had to pick a horse I chose PyQt partly because the most > popular thread on PySide was about PySide being dead :-) Things may have of > course changed over the last few years. > > > > > On 10 June 2014 15:45, Luc-Eric Rousseau <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not a lot of development going on in Pyside -- it doesn't even have a >> clear roadmap to support Qt 5. It's very frustrating. >> >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Alok Gandhi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi Halim, >> > >> > Although I think pyside is more actively developed but for more >> information please dig up an old thread for a similar discussion. >> > >> > Sent from my iPhone >> > >> >> On Jun 10, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Halim Negadi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello All, >> >> >> >> I need to write a standalone client to deal with a web database >> through a rest API. >> >> The python CLI is done and I just need to wrap this up in a nice GUI. >> >> I will need the GUI to be working as a standalone application as well >> as embedded in softwares like Soft, Nuke or Maya. >> >> Both PySide and PyQt toolkits are actively maintained, I was wondering >> wich one to use and would be intersted in your guys opinion on this. >> >> >> >> Thank you in advance. >> >> >> >> -H. >> >> >> > >> > > -- Jens Lindgren -------------------------- Lead Technical Director Magoo 3D Studios <http://www.magoo3dstudios.com/>
