This! there is a term for it, but i can't remember. :P gathering nodes and organizing them.
http://wpfiles.darkvertex.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/ICEtree_DeformWithSourceMesh.png On 15 July 2014 20:53, Sergio Mucino <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean by "with a statement". Can you elaborate? > > > Sergio Muciño. > Sent from my iPad. > > On Jul 15, 2014, at 3:46 PM, Sebastien Sterling < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Ooo ! does it have a system for gathering a group of nodes with a > statement and moving them around ?, > > > On 15 July 2014 20:25, Tim Crowson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ah that's true! I forgot about that! Good reminder... >> >> >> On 7/15/2014 2:03 PM, Serch Mucino wrote: >> >> You can also assign colors to nodes directly in the schematic view (even >> non-item related nodes, such as math nodes). I would like Modo to >> color-code sockets by data type. That would be quite useful. >> >> ---- >> Sergio Mucino >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Tim Crowson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The color coding of nodes in Modo's is very different from ICE's: >>> instead of coding by node type, they inherit the color assigned to the item >>> they represent. So for example, in the Item List, if you select something, >>> right-click, and set the 'Editor Color', the corresponding node(s) will be >>> outlined in that color in the Schematic. >>> >>> It's not like ICE, but it's something at least, so you don't *have *to >>> stare at a sea of light gray outlines. At the rate they've been improving >>> Modo's schematic over the last couple of versions, I expect cool stuff in >>> the future. >>> >>> -Tim >>> >>> >>> On 7/15/2014 1:45 PM, Sebastien Sterling wrote: >>> >>> Modo's nodes are quite pretty, all they need is a bit of color to >>> identify different components of a tree :), why is no one else doing this ? >>> >>> is it because an ICE trees layout is linear ? so its easier to identify >>> where the beginning and end of things is happening and subsequent color >>> coding ? >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> > >
