Never really went there for docs. There were a few articles by various
folks that were helpful sure. The majority though was covered in the docs I
felt.

I'm not looking for it to be taken down, just was wondering what people
were looking on there for these days. Can't remember the last time I was on
there.

Eric T.

--------------------------------------------
Eric Thivierge
http://www.ethivierge.com

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Jason S <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
>  Other recipients:  [email protected], [email protected]
>
> Just in case you are interested...
>
> In fact, many links within the documentation actually display wiki pages
> or html files hosted on the wiki.
>
> Long live the Softimage wiki! :)
>
>
> So What happened to those doc pages hosted on the Wiki
>
> And many (if not *most*) searches give many results on Wiki pages and
> little and sometimes none to doc pages
>
> And There were also quite a few things  specific to there.
>
> And many links around point to the Wiki as opposed to Doc pages (for a
> reason)
>
> Why for heaven sakes take it down? Too much bandwidth?
>
>
> On 01/27/15 15:27, Eric Thivierge wrote:
>
>  What is on the wiki that isn't in the docs or else where?
>
>  Eric T.
>
>  --------------------------------------------
> Eric Thivierge
> http://www.ethivierge.com
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Jeff McFall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> That would be a shame, I noticed it not responding a couple of days ago
>> as well
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Leendert A. Hartog
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 2:38 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Softimage WIKI dead?
>>
>> This was just reported on the si-community:
>> it seems the Softimage WIKI has gone offline and it apparently has been
>> offline for at least a week.
>> Is this a temporary outage or has it finally been killed?
>>
>> Greetz
>> Leendert
>>
>> --
>>
>> Leendert A. Hartog AKA Hirazi Blue
>> Administrator NOT the owner of si-community.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to