Hi Graham ;)

Just to clarify I wasnt talking about the safe harbor statement (which is 
really a listed companies version of lacking any form of a backbone or 
willingness to take any responsibility for what their actions might bring) I 
was talking about the circular covering in the paragraphs above that.

I know far more people who are dropping Adobe purely because they did exactly 
the same thing. Some of them are still tied into long term contracts (3-5 
years). But once that time is past Autodesk will be in the same position of 
wishing they had listened more to what their customers actually want , and less 
to what their bean counters told them they wanted. The only people who are 
listening at Autodesk are the people looking after educational licences..

Kind regards

Angus






________________________________
From: Graham Bell [[email protected]]
Sent: 04 February 2015 08:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Subscription Transition for New Software Licenses

No, more to do with being public listed company.

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Angus Davidson
Sent: 04 February 2015 17:11
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Subscription Transition for New Software Licenses

Am I the only one not impressed that they spent more of the press release 
covering their own ass.

Sign of the times.


--
Angus Davidson
ICT Project Leader - Digital Arts
University of the Witwatersrand


On 04 February 2015 at 3:25:51 PM, Leendert A. Hartog 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:
This just dropped in my mailbox:
"Autodesk Details Subscription Transition for New Software Licenses"
http://news.autodesk.com/press-release/archived/autodesk-details-subscription-transition-new-software-licenses

Greetz
Leendert

--

Leendert A. Hartog AKA Hirazi Blue
Administrator NOT the owner of si-community.com
This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is confidential. If 
you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and 
destroy the original message. You may not copy or disseminate this 
communication without the permission of the University. Only authorised 
signatories are competent to enter into agreements on behalf of the University 
and recipients are thus advised that the content of this message may not be 
legally binding on the University and may contain the personal views and 
opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the views and opinions of The 
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the 
University and outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University 
agrees in writing to the contrary.
</table<>




<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" 
style="width:100%;">
<tr>
<td align="left" style="text-align:justify;"><font face="arial,sans-serif" 
size="1" color="#999999"><span style="font-size:11px;">This communication is 
intended for the addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original 
message. You may not copy or disseminate this communication without the 
permission of the University. Only authorised signatories are competent to 
enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus 
advised that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the 
University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which 
are not necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the 
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and 
outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in 
writing to the contrary. </span></font></td>
</tr>
</table

Reply via email to