It's hard to get information from AD in this regards and even resellers
doesn't seem to know exactly whats possible in some cases.

 

The following reflects my knowledge. You should verify it with your reseller
to make sure. Ask twice because sometimes, they may have outdated
information or want to sell something different from what you want :) I got
wrong infos in the first place from mine as well. 

 

Upgrading existing licenses:

You can upgrade standalone and network licenses of Softimage to version 2015
from six version back (from version 2010 an up).

You can upgrade these licenses until Feb 2016. I did it end of last year and
it was around 2,500 EUR. Until mid 2014 it was a few hundred bucks less.

You cannot upgrade Softimage alone anymore, you have to choose the bundle.
No matter if you have network license or standalone.

Subscription isn't needed to upgrade an existing license.

 

Buying new licenses:

You *can* still buy additional licenses as an existing Softimage costumer
until Feb 2016. But it's the same deal as with upgrading, you will need to
buy the bundle. AFAIK it's around 5,000EUR now.

Subscription isn't needed to buy additional licenses.

 

License management / flexlm:

flexlm had a few changes since 2010 but I used the old flexlm from xsi2011
(v11.7.0.0) with the new license file without problems. However if you're
running an even older version then you may need to update the flexlm. I had
this at a company when XSI2015 refused to start because they were running a
very old flexlm version. AD changed licensing check via flexlm internally
somehow.

 

You can combine your old license (xsi2011) and the new xsi2015 within one
file. So yes you can run both versions simultaniously and have all batch
render lics available as well as the mental ray lics. (5 per softimage seat
plus the GUI version, resulting in 6 batchrender licences if your not using
the GUI. In your case it would be two softimage versions at the same time
and 10 batch render lics. However, you cannot use the batchrender lics from
2011 for 2015 scenes of course. Nor vice versa.

If the machine name and its'MAC ID didn't change for both versions just
copy/paste the new license text into the old file and restart flexlm. I'm
not sure about mixed server IDs in one file but instead you can just create
a second service for the new license and run both.

 

AFAIK flexlm doesn't check with AD servers, since it's designed to work in
closed environments. The companies license server or fileserver or wherever
the flexlm is running on, usually have no internet access. 

 

Hope this helps.

 

cheers,

Sven

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Derek Jenson
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 5:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: can I still get softimage?

 

I've done my best to keep up with the details of 'upgrading' to Softimage
2015, but still have a few questions; I have a network license of Softimage
2011sp2.

I likely should have upgraded when Autodesk still allowed upgrades, if I was
going to switch to another AD tool. At the time I was quoted $2200 to bring
my 2011 license up to 2015. However, I would have received a Maya/Max &
Softimage standalone license in place of my network license, losing all my
batch licenses. I was also in mid production with 2011, so trying to look
ahead 2 years in this industry is impossible; things change quickly. Parting
with with $$ for tools I can't use for at least a year just didn't make
sense at the time. And honestly, I feel like I've been trying to protect
myself against future AD decisions with the 'upgrade' offer... and that is
not the relationship I want with a vendor. 

So as I understand it, all 'upgrade' offers are for standalone, correct?
 And at this point there is no 'upgrade', they are simply offering a new
Max/Maya & Softimage bundle product to existing holders of Softimage
licenses; so I would retain my network 2011 license, correct? 
In the US, this cost is $3600-3700?
And I could run both Softimage 2011sp2 and 2015sp2 at the same time,
correct? 
How has the license server changed from 2011 to 2015? It sounds like the
client needs to check-in with an AD server? 
Blender is open source and free right? Just joking, I know the answer to
that one ;)

Any help with any of these questions is appreciated. My gut feeling is I
will not upgrade, but will switch to another tool. I also feel that AD is
pushing the monthly fee so I can easily pickup Max/Maya for a month here or
there in the future as needed and keep my thou$ands under my pillow.

-Derek

  _____  

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:58:56 -0500
Subject: Re: can I still get softimage?
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

Rob,

Any chance you know a reseller honoring this? The one I talked to here in
Toronto does not. : (

 

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Rob Chapman <[email protected]> wrote:

not necessarily only the suite, you can currently get Maya 2016 with
softimage option. Standalone license with no maintenance.  have to be quick,
this 'offer' wont be available for long as everything soon will be cloud
subscription and softimage aint ever going to be on there

 

On 13 November 2015 at 13:21, Personal <[email protected]> wrote:

I think that is only option.

 

-- 

Micic Srecko

-------------------

Mail: 

[email protected]

Skype:srecko.micic

-------------------

On 13/11/2015 14:17:20, Chris Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

Sorry guys....I disappeared from the list for a while...I'm sure this
subject has come up a number of times!?

What is the cheapest/best way to get a license of soft? Or can I still even
do that? Last time I touched base with a reseller I had to buy the Suite
which was around $10,000 Canadian!





-- 

Chris Johnson |  <http://www.someonescousin.com/> www.someonescousin.com |
416.473.1624

          <https://www.facebook.com/someonescousin/>             








 <https://www.facebook.com/someonescousin/>  

 <https://www.facebook.com/someonescousin/> 


-- 

 <https://www.facebook.com/someonescousin/> Chris Johnson |
www.someonescousin.com | 416.473.1624

 <https://www.facebook.com/someonescousin/>                      



 <https://www.facebook.com/someonescousin/> 



Reply via email to