Got it. Thanks, Alain. Best Regards, Zhen
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Durand, Alain<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 8/16/09 3:56 AM, "Zhen Cao" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Alain and All, > > I have a question on MTU issue in ipv4-in-ipv6 softwire. I notice > Sec.10.2 of DS-Lite draft has discussed the MTU problem. The draft > introduces one possible way of using TCP MSS option to avoid IP layer > fragmentation and reassembly. It is a good idea but how about the case > for UDP sockets? I suppose there should be a general way to handle the > MTU issue? Thanks for any explanation. > > > Zhen, > > The ‘generic’ way is as described in the draft & RFC2473, ie encapsulate the > IPv4 datagram into an IPv6 datagram that happens to be too big to be > transmitted and the fragment the IPv6 datagram. Reverse the procedure at the > end of the tunnel. > > - Alain. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
