> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Rémi Després > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:55 AM > To: Brian E Carpenter > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > Templin, Fred L > Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [Softwires] Some Thought aboutthe AutomaticTunnelAddress > > > Le 18 sept. 09 à 22:59, Brian E Carpenter a écrit : > > > Hi Eric, > > > > On 2009-09-19 02:33, [email protected] wrote: > > ... > >> Automatic tunnelling must be limited to a "Site". > > > > If you are referring to ISATAP, that may be a sustainable position. > > However, by definition, 6to4 and Teredo involve multiple sites, > > for any reasonable definition of site. > > ... and we can add 6rd (an ISP IP4 network across which IPv6 is > tunneled in 6rd isn't in general considered a "site").
That depends on one's definition of "site". I would consider the ISP network as a site that contains other sites (i.e., recursively-nested sites-within-sites). Fred [email protected] > > Regards, > > RD > > _______________________________________________ > Behave mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
