Hi Ted, I updated the draft based on your suggestions, and found that I was able to make a number of other simplifications also:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-templin-isatap-dhcp-04.txt Please take a look and let me know if this resolves your concerns. Thanks - Fred [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ted > Lemon > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 1:12 PM > To: Templin, Fred L > Cc: [email protected]; dhc WG > Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Comments on draft-templin-isatap-dhcp-03.txt > > On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > > But, the reason I want the flexibility of getting > > FQDNs is that some ISATAP sites might use a site-specific > > name service other than the DNS (e.g., mDNS or LLMNR) > > that may not even be accessible to the DHCP server. > > Bizarre. But sure, okay, that's a good reason. :') > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
