Dear Troan, Thank you.
Thanks and Regards Santhosh ****************************************************************************************** This email and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained here in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! ***************************************************************************************** ----- Original Message ----- From: Ole Troan <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2010 7:53 pm Subject: Re: [Softwires] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-softwire-ipv6-6rd-04.txt To: SanthoshReddyY 71702 <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > Santosh, > > > We are considering Service Provider gateway (6RD gateway) should > directly connected to IPv6 internet. > > [In this case, using ISATAP also we can achieve same] > > > > If SP gateway is not directly connected to IPv6 internet (when we > are using ISATAP), we can use ISATAP with manual tunnel. > > I want to point out comparision between 6RD and ISATAP > applicability. > you can of course connect the 6rd BR to the IPv6 Internet any way > imaginable just as you can with an ISATAP router. > > > Is there any deployment advantages in 6RD over ISATAP ? (Please > clarify) > ISATAP (and 6over4) are tunnel mechanisms which create a virtual > Ethernet connecting isolated hosts. > > 6rd (and 6to4) are tunnel mechanisms which allow isolated _sites_ > to connect to each other. > > one is within an organisation, the other is between organisations. > > 6rd implicitly does prefix delegation. ISATAP does SLAAC as a part > of a shared /64. > > very different deployment scenarios. (of course where things start > to blend together is if you chose to use one of them just for > transport, e.g ISATAP or 6to4 and then used DHCP PD on top of that, > with native prefixes.) > > Best regards, > Ole > > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
