Le 2 mars 2010 à 02:09, Templin, Fred L a écrit : > Remi, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Rémi Després >> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:04 PM >> To: Ole Troan >> Cc: [email protected]; Templin, Fred L >> Subject: Re: [Softwires] SOFTWIRE working group last call on 6rd >> >> Hi Fred, >> >> Although the SEAL approach has IMHO some merit of its own for some >> generalized tunneling scenarios, >> using it in 6rd would defeat the objective of simplicity for "rapid >> deployment" of IPv6. > > There is an opportunity at hand to get tunneling done right > the first time and then have a long-term quality IPv6 service. > 6rd is a large piece to the puzzle, but there are other pieces > that would make for a more complete solution. IMHO, we can > have it both ways of doing it fast *and* doing it right on > the first iteration.
Different view here. As far as 6rd is concerned, doing it right is IMO keeping it as is. Regards, RD _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
