Wg, > > As chairs, We¹ve been looking at the MTU thread on 6rd. There has been many > good points made and we have had an healthy discussion. It is now time to move > on with the base spec. MTU is one of the many operational issues with 6rd. The > chairs and the authors discussed a while back to have a companion document to > 6rd that will focus on exactly those operational considerations. We do believe > that the 6rd MTU discussion belongs there. > In order to not tie the hands of that new document, it will be better if the > base spec were to remain silent on the MTU issue. > This future operational document should be focused on 6rd and not try to solve > the generic tunneling MTU discussion. > The generic work is important too, and certainly need to find a home. However > this is a different topic, for future discussions with our ADs. > - Alain & David.
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
