Hi Boucadair,

I'm wondering if I have missed something in this draft. I can understand
that in this extended DS-Lite, ICXF is core stateless and it is quite
scalable for core routers. However,  since CPEs can send both IPv4 packet
and IPv6 packet to AFTR, it will then include double NAT problem if we have
to allocate private IPv4 address to CPEs. Then what is the advantage of this
kind of DS-Lite vs. NAT666 plus dual stack?

Thank you very much.

Best regards

Qiong SUN
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to