On 2010-04-16 05:04, Rémi Després wrote:
(The current scope is: - DS-lite only - Only port-control servers
that assign ports one by one.)
1. With the IPv4 address shortage, ISP NATs will be more and more
necessary not only in point-to-point configurations, DS-lite in
particular, but also in point-to-multipoint configurations, NAT444 in
particular. PCP should therefore be a *generic port reservation
protocol* applicable to both point-to-point and point-to-multipoint
access networks*. If this would be difficult, reasons why limiting to
DS-lite would significantly simplify the design should IMHO be
discussed.
I had understood the scope to also include NAT64. See section 2.
Unless the authors foresee specific problems with a larger scope, I
agree it should be expanded to "any NAT44 or NAT64." Let's focus on
logical functions, not on specific deployments.
The scope should also include multiple layers of NAT.
Simon
--
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
