Removed the incorrect NAT66 reference.
On 7/30/10 4:08 PM, "Yiu Leung Lee" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > In RFC 3697, it says: > > "A flow is a sequence of packets sent from a particular source to a > particular unicast, anycast, or multicast destination that the source > desires to label as a flow." > > It later says the usage of a flow: > > "The usage of the 3-tuple of the Flow Label and the Source and > Destination Address fields enables efficient IPv6 flow > classification, where only IPv6 main header fields in fixed positions > are used." > > I am confused why we can't use a flow label to effectively identify a flow > from a host behind a CPE in the AFTR. In what part this usage is against the > specification? > > Thanks, > Yiu > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
