Le 16 oct. 2010 à 08:05, Tina TSOU a écrit : > Hi Softwiresers, > An I-D " 'Gateway-Initiated' 6rd" was submitted today. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tsou-softwire-gwinit-6rd-00 > > Abstract > > This document proposes a modification to the 6rd deployment model for > IPv6.
Wouldn't it be better to say "proposes an alternative 6rd deployment model to that of RFC 5969". ( "proposes a change to the 6rd deployment model" can be taken as meaning that the deployment model of RFC 5569 is no longer valid. This isn't the idea, right?) > This model extends existing access tunnels beyond an operator- > owned gateway collocated with the operator's IPv4 network edge to the > Border Router. This modification makes it unnecessary to provide > IPv4 routes to IPv6 UEs. The gateway serves as an aggregation point > for IPv4 routing. In my understanding, the address format of Figure 4 excludes that hosts use SLAAC. If it is so, it should IMHO be noted in the document. Regards, RD > > > Your comments are welcome. > > Have a nice weekend. > > pple-style-span" face="Arial"> > B. R. > Tina > http://tinatsou.weebly.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
