Sheng Jiang wrote: > Thanks so much for your valuable comments. Most of them are addressed in the > next version. A couple > of explanation is below. > > We rename the attribute "6rd-Configuration". 6rd is a term for "IPv6 rapid > deployment mechanism". > It cannot be replaced by other name.
That makes no sense. The name has *no* impact on the protocol. It could be named "XYZ-Foo", and still have the same functionality. The name *does* have impact on administrators of RADIUS systems, and implementors of RADIUS specifications. Using a name that follows existing RADIUS naming practices is a good idea. The above name does *not* follow existing RADIUS naming practices. Again, using a name such as "IPv6-RD-Configuration", or "IPv6-6rd-Configuration" *would* follow existing RADIUS naming practices, with no loss of functionality or clarity. > We have edited the length description like below, hope it is ok. > > "20 + n*4 (the length of the entire attribute in octets; n stands the number > of BR IPv4 addresses, > minimum n is 1)." That's fine. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
